DOC

doc/discretization.md

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ permutations.
 
 ## Matrix current
 
-We can also calculate the matrix current $j\mapsto{}i$ between neighboring cells:
+We can also calculate the matrix current $`j\mapsto{}i`$ between neighboring cells:
 ```math
   J_{ij}^a
   =
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ $`\mathcal{O}(h^2)`$. The asymmetry arises when $`T^a`$ does not commute
 with $`U_{ij}`$, so it is an issue only for the SU(2) component. The
 problem is only in the interpretation.
 
-The currents measured at sites $`i`$ and $`j`$ are different: since
+The currents measured at sites *i* and *j* are different: since
 the parallel transport of spin between these two locations can imply
 rotation due to the gauge field, there's no reason why we should have
 $`J_{ij}=-J_{ji}`$, except in the continuum limit where the two points
@@ -239,5 +239,5 @@ automatic differentiation (AD). Only a routine evaluating the value of
 the action is then needed, in terms of the AD dual variables.
 
 When looking for the saddle point in equilibrium, the problem becomes
-even simpler; $`Q`$ has then additional restrictions, and we are looking
-for the minimum of the free energy $`S`$.
+even simpler; *Q* has then additional restrictions, and we are looking
+for the minimum of the free energy *S*.